Comments for blog4fm http://blog4fm.wordpress.com the blog for facilities management from 4FM Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:49:38 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Facilities Management now in Second Life by Alexwebmaster http://blog4fm.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/facilities-management-now-in-second-life/#comment-421 Alexwebmaster Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:49:38 +0000 http://blog4fm.wordpress.com/?p=56#comment-421 Hello webmaster I would like to share with you a link to your site write me here preonrelt@mail.ru Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru

]]> Comment on Environmental Property Code by Listlessly http://blog4fm.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/environmental-property-code/#comment-420 Listlessly Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:53:33 +0000 http://blog4fm.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-420 Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit. cheers, Listlessly. Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway … nice blog to visit.

cheers, Listlessly.

]]> Comment on Environmental Property Code by fairsnape http://blog4fm.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/environmental-property-code/#comment-410 fairsnape Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:44:25 +0000 http://blog4fm.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-410 Having scanned the pdf file, the EPC paper raises a number of questions: I question how these will address the social enterprise / cbfm agenda ? the focus is (mainly) on hard environmental issues, with an inclusion of a few soft measures? The data is in M2 - not within the emerging M3 space measurement for heating and comfort factors. Will this lead to improved benchmarking ? (not sure) The worked example doesn't include the more difficult but community important issues such as carbon emissions through travel,which can be huge for an ill sited large HQ, or indeed any of the non hard measures. What counts is what cannot be counted - is there something important missing here - future more in-depth reading will reveal it maybe. I would have liked to have seen a carbon footprint output for a building or even an ecological footprint (better) The measures are very 'local' to the 'building' not rippling out too far to the community of addressing other eco-social issues - as demonstrated by the comparison between the GRI reporting table and these EPC's Is this a step in the right direction and a real contribution ???? How does it tie in with a BREEAM or as its a global code - LEED Platinum schemes for buildings in use? Having scanned the pdf file, the EPC paper raises a number of questions:

I question how these will address the social enterprise / cbfm agenda ? the focus is (mainly) on hard environmental issues, with an inclusion of a few soft measures?

The data is in M2 – not within the emerging M3 space measurement for heating and comfort factors.

Will this lead to improved benchmarking ? (not sure)

The worked example doesn’t include the more difficult but community important issues such as carbon emissions through travel,which can be huge for an ill sited large HQ, or indeed any of the non hard measures.

What counts is what cannot be counted – is there something important missing here – future more in-depth reading will reveal it maybe.

I would have liked to have seen a carbon footprint output for a building or even an ecological footprint (better) The measures are very ‘local’ to the ‘building’ not rippling out too far to the community of addressing other eco-social issues – as demonstrated by the comparison between the GRI reporting table and these EPC’s

Is this a step in the right direction and a real contribution ???? How does it tie in with a BREEAM or as its a global code – LEED Platinum schemes for buildings in use?

]]>